View My Stats

Monday, June 15, 2009

The Jokester Vs. The Political Animal.

Usually I don't use this space to mouthe off politcally.

Not that I don't have strong political opinions. I do.

It's just that I don't feel that I usually have much to add to the public forum that hasn't already been said by Keith Olbermann.

But this dust-up between Sarah Palin and David Letterman has left me with thoughts that I've found unexpressed anywhere else that I have found.

I received this mass e-mail from one of my readers. I didn't ask for permission to reprint it, because it wasn't sent only to me personally.

Here are excerpts:

"I enjoy most of David Letterman's humor. Fact is, I generally prefer Letterman over Leno . . .
I think Letterman was way out of bounds on his "jokes" regarding Sarah Palin and her daughter(s). It was poor taste, unnecessary, not at all classy.

Leno would occasionally border on jokes that were a little too risque, but I don't think he'd have ever done something like this.

Leno was, and is a world class performer. Letterman was, and is. Except Letterman really messed up on this imbroglio. Perhaps he'll learn.

.......Letterman goofed and should have made a simple apology instead of turning it into a seven minute desk spot."

Here's how I responded:

"Palin brought all this on by herself by shlepping her knocked-up daughter up onstage at the Convention.
If it were a Democrat with a knocked-up daughter, the Republicans would never let him or her hear the end of it.
Letterman has already apologized several times. What more do we want from him?
Palin implying that he is some kind of child predator is typically way out of line.
But I think Letterman is thriving on the attention.
Very few people like Palin.
One of these people is intelligent, and the other is not."

I now realize that there is more to be said.

I have since watched all the Letterman episodes from the past week, which I had Tivo'd.

Much as I admire and respect Letterman, and think he is totally right in this situation, I think he's acted like a complete wuss.

He has compounded this by issuing an even more humble, serious apology on the show that aired on Monday night. All about how the perception of the joke can sometimes be more important than the joke.
Is this network pressure that we are witnessing?
God, I'd hate to think he'd succumb to something like that.

This seems way off base to me.

If you're accused of making a joke about someone's child being a victim of a child predator, which Letterman did NOT intend to do, not even knowing that the 14 year old was at the ballgame with Palin and Giuliani, and which he said he did NOT do, and which, as he said, anyone who knows him or his show knows he did NOT do, you must be HIGHLY INSULTED.
You don't suck up to that , forgive me, bimbo.


Not like the phony umbrage that a political animal like Palin, who knows better, is taking.

Seven minutes of relatively light banter about it is letting her off way too easily.

He should have swatted her like the mosquito she is.

He should have put her in her place, which is somewhere under a rock.

He shouldn't be inviting her on his show so she can turn him down.

He should be issuing a public banning of her from his show.

That's what she deserves, and that's what will help his ratings more than anything else.

You just KNOW that this is how he really feels about it.

But to make yet another public apology?

He has been totally manipulated by someone vastly inferior to him.

I can't for the life of me figure out why.

Where are his cohones?

And why aren't they on display here?

Does he really think his audience is made up of Palin fans?

This one does not compute.

Letterman and Palin have totally different agendas.

Letterman's is to make highly edged sarcastic jokes about everyone in the public eye.

That's his job, and he does it really well.

If he had to apologize every time he offended anyone, he would be doing nothing BUT apologize.

Palin's is to keep herself in the public eye at all costs.

As a political animal, one knows that sincerity takes a back seat to everything.

She can't possibly be as offended as she's making out to be.

Letterman isn't and really can't be a political animal.
It doesn't seem to be part of his genetic makeup.

Bill Clinton and John Edwards and Eliot Spitzer had to do the political dance in public of how they disgraced their families by committing adultery.
You know they'd all like to have said "Yeah, I screwed around. Why is this your business?"

Letterman could have just as easily said "Yeah, I told an offensive joke at your expense, Governor, and your daughter will survive it. It comes with the territory. Get over it."


It has served both of them to keep this story alive.

But Letterman keeping it alive this way is causing me to lose some respect for him.

Dennis Miller (of all people) was once confronted by a member of someone's family.
That someone was treated quite tastelessly in a joke that Miller had told.
And the family member called him on it in a public situation.

Miller thought about it for a moment, and said "You know what? You shouldn't like me."

And that was the end of it.

This family member wasn't a political animal, so there was nothing left to be said.

And that's where it should sit here. Palin, if she was really offended, shouldn't like Letterman.

And that should be the end of it.

And Letterman, if he was really offended, which he should be, shouldn't like Palin, and should have blasted her on his show.

And that should have been the end of it.
If it wasn't, it would have fanned the flames, and be a really great story, instead of the nauseating one it has become.




    David Letterman's hate is as old as some ancient Hebrew prophets.
    Speaking of anti-Semitism, it's Jerry Falwell and other fundy leaders who've gleefully predicted that in the future EVERY nation will be against Israel (an international first?) and that TWO-THIRDS of all Jews will be killed, right?
    Wrong! It's the ancient Hebrew prophet Zechariah who predicted all this in the 13th and 14th chapters of his book! The last prophet, Malachi, explains the reason for this future Holocaust that'll outdo even Hitler's by stating that "Judah hath dealt treacherously" and "the Lord will cut off the man that doeth this" and asks "Why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother?"
    Haven't evangelicals generally been the best friends of Israel and Jewish persons? Then please explain the recent filthy, hate-filled, back-stabbing tirades by David Letterman (and Sandra Bernhard) against a leading evangelical named Sarah Palin, and explain why most Jewish leaders have seemingly condoned Palin's continuing "crucifixion"!
    While David and Sandra are tragically turning comedy into tragedy, they are also helping to speed up and fulfill the Final Holocaust a la Zechariah and Malachi, thus helping to make the Bible even more believable!
    (For even more stunning information, visit MSN and type in "Separation of Raunch and State" and "Bible Verses Obama Avoids.")

  2. It would be nice if he would make cracks about Obama once in a while. But he doesn't. He has become, along with Jon Stewart, a de-facto arm of Obama's spin machine. Whereas from 2001-2008, they were "truth to power", they are now "speaking for the power".

    But Letterman and Stewart have been enabled by their media cheerleaders and enablers to pull off the "clown nose on/clown nose off" act, whereby they can throw any bombs they wish, retreat behind the "but I'm just a comedian" line if things get dicey, but demand to be taken seriously when they say they should be.

    It comes with the territory. Blowback sometimes does happen.

  3. Mark,

    As you are starting to see in your comments section, if Letterman doesn't say what he said last night this thing really spins out of control.

    I noticed how the story was being handled on the Sunday talk shows. After they got through with other less important topics like Iranian elections, healthcare, and the economy, most of them got the basic facts of the story wrong.

    I saw one web site that gave ten examples of jokes about Gov. Palin's daughter and family that were ignored by everyone. In fact, some of them were done on SNL not too long before the Gov. made an appearance on the show. One of the jokes was about incest.

    Now I don't believe by her silence after the incest joke that she really condones incest. To make that leap of logic would be ridiculous. Just as this whole thing is.

  4. John, spinning out of control is what would make it a great story instead of a sickening one.

    Anonymous, Letterman and Stewart may be hiding behind "but I'm just a comedian", but at least they had the courage not to be anonymous.

  5. (Jay, still can't figure out what I can use to be non-anonymous. Or is that "nymous"?)

    Mark, and previous anons, rumor has it (or at least used to) that in his "private life," Letterman is (or at least used to be) a Republican. It's his writers that are plausibly the "arms of the Obama spin machine," or at least the Ivy League / SNL left-leaning humor machine. Perhaps that's why he sometimes seems to go out of his way to apologize for the words they put in his mouth about the likes of Palin. Not sure I believe that in this case (and I have not heard the original words, nor Palin's objections, nor any of the apologies), but I thought I'd throw it out there.

    Personally, I'd sooner have voted for Michael Palin than Sarah. But that's neither here nor there.

  6. Jay, where it says Comment as:, open it to where
    it says name/url.
    Then type in Jay under name, and under url. Then click "continue".
    Letterman's political leanings should not contribute to why he should be insulted, in my opinion.

  7. OK, does this work? Yup! Thanks, Mark.

    You're probably right about why Letterman "should be" insulted, and certainly shouldn't apologize (except maybe to flight attendants about comparing Palin to one (;-)). No way Jon Stewart would apologize. I think Letterman may tend to let people off the hook because he perceives them as being "in the same business," i.e. entertainment. (Again, Stewart certainly didn't let Jim Cramer, or the Limbaughs and O'Reillys, off the hook on those grounds.) You know and I know, and I suspect Letterman knows, that politics isn't and shouldn't be entertainment. But I also suspect a lot of Letterman's audience views the whole thing as just another "celebrity dustup." And Letterman certainly knows that.

    I'm not justifying him (and again, I haven't heard or read the actual exchanges), or disagreeing with anything you've said. Just speculating about the possible motivations for his unsatisfactory (to you, and probably me if I knew more) actions or inactions.

  8. I am a major fan of Dave's, and I do not enjoy saying anything negative about him.
    I simply find his actions all very surprising, considering his history.

  9. Good poѕt. I learn something totally nеw anԁ
    chаllengіng οn wеbsitеs I ѕtumbleuρon еverуday.

    It wіll alwayѕ be useful tо rеaԁ artiсles from otheг authoгs аnԁ ргаctice somеthing fгom other wеbѕіtes.

    Stop by my websitе - Www.Igrus.Com
    Also see my page:

  10. Εverу weeκend i uѕеd to pay
    a quicκ visit thіs ωeb page,
    as i ωant enjoyment, since this thіs websіte conаtions in fact
    fastidious funny ԁаta toο.

    Fеel fгеe to surf to my ωeblog:

  11. current management of non alcoholic fatty liver disease and non alcoholic steatohepatitis current
    management of non alcoholic fatty liver disease and non alcoholic steatohepatitis current management of non alcoholic fatty
    liver disease and non alcoholic steatohepatitis

    Look into my web blog; medications that cause non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

  12. I was suggested this website by my cousin. I am not sure whether this post is written by him as nobody else know such detailed about
    my trouble. You are incredible! Thanks!

    Feel free to surf to my site - medifast diet

  13. AudioCodes could receive an upfront fee (E SBCs, consulting and setup costs) and then charge $3 $5 per subscriber per month.
    I believe that AudioCodes is making it a cloud based solution and this seems to be confirmed
    by today's news as it announced "the expansion of its One Voice offering with a new cloud based enterprise mobility solution suite for business customers".

    mlb orioles snapbacks



Blog Archive

About Me

Hi. I am, according to my Wikipedia entry,(which I did not create) a noted television writer, playwright, screenwriter, and occasional actor. You can Google me or go to the IMDB to get my credits, and you can come here to get my opinions on things, which I'll try to express eloquently. Hopefully I'll succeed. You can also e-mail me at Perhaps my biggest claim to fame is being responsible, for about six months in 1975, while Head Writer for the "Happy Days" TV series, for Americans saying to each other "Sit on it."